Friday, July 3, 2009

Finding HCF n LCM of typical values.

Today's concept : Finding HCF n LCM of typical values.

#1 : to find the HCF, LCM quickly.

i know most of us wud know this....if v have few nos., 20,40,50,80,180...to find their LCMs, HCF...there's a slightly quick method...

express them in prime nos.

20 = 2^2 x 5
40 = 2^3 x 5
50 = 5^2 x 2
80 = 2^4 x 5
180 =3^2 x 2^2 x 5

now to HCF, see highest power of all prime nos. that are common to all nos.

2 - 2
3- 0
5 - 1

hence hcf is 2^2 x 5 = 20

to find lcm...see highest power of all prime nos across all nos.

2 - 4
3 - 2
5 - 1

hence, lcm = 2^4 x 3^2 x 5 = 1620.


#2 To find HCF and LCM of the form-

2222....30 times.

3333....70 times.

to solve such questions...

for HCF..

take hcf of no. thats being repeated...i.e. hcf of 2 & 3. i.e. 1

take hcf of no. of time these nos. are being repeated...i.e. hcf of 30 n 70...thats 10.

so the hcf is 111...written 10 times.

For LCM...

take lcm of no. thats being repeated...i.e. lcm of 2 & 3. i.e. 6

take lcm of no. of time these nos. are being repeated...i.e. lcm of 30 n 70...thats 210.

so the hcf is 666...written 210 times.

#3...to find hcf and lcm of following form...

2^300 - 1, 8^250 - 1.

the idea is..a^n - b^n is always divisible by a-b. so v need to find highest a-b that will divide a^n - b^n and smallest term that'll be divisible by a^n - b^n.

express them in a common base.

2^300 - 1 and 2^750 -1.

to find hcf...

take hcf of powers i.e. hcf of 300 and 750...i.e. 150

so the hcf is 2^150 - 1.

to find lcm....

take lcm of powers i.e. lcm of 300 and 750...i.e. 1500

so the hcf is 2^1500 - 1.




Questions :

find hcf and lcm of:

1.2222...250 times and 8888...300 times

2. 333....120 times and 1111...400 times

3. 111...700 times and 9999...200 times.

4. HCF of 33333...200 times. and 777777.....300 times

5. 32^250 -1 & 16 ^ 100 - 1.

6. 81^100 -1 & 243 ^ 200 - 1.

7. 343^150-1 & 2401^100 - 1.

8. 125^200 - 1 & 625^120 - 1.

9. 169^320 - 1 & 32^160 - 1.

for the following questns...

mark 1. - stmt 1 is sufficient.
2- stmt 2 is suff.
3-both are reqd to solve the questn.
4-either is suff.
5-both insufficient.

10. what is the hcf of 5 nos., a,b,c,d,e?

stmt 1 - a=72,b=4,c=6
stmt 2 - d= 8, e = 27.

easy set...hope many wud get all correct...

finding squares and close multiplications quickly...

Today's concept....finding squares and close multiplications quickly...

In a hurry guys....so few small concepts that'll help u save sum time...n avoid cramming....which i've always maintained is the best ill-preparation for cat.

#1 finding squares.

step 1. think of a base which is a multiple of 10 or 100 (whichever nearer to the no. whose square is to be determined.)

suppose 34^2.

a gud base wud be 30.

express 34 as 30 + 4 (i.e. base + 4)...i'll call this base + deviation

step 2.

ldigit(s) before 0 in base x (no. + deviation) | deviation^2 where | is an imaginary line separating 2 parts of calculation.

i.e. 3x(34 + 4) | 4^2

i.e 114 | 16.

now the important thing....no. of digits on right side of the imaginary line shud be exactly same as the no. of zeros in our base..dont forget this!!!!

since our base 30 has only one 0 at the end, v can have only one digit on right side of the imaginary line....the less powerful digit...thats 6.

and thus, one has to be carried to the left side....so 114 will become 115.

so the expression becomes...115 | 6

hence, the answer is 1156.


look at few more examples for practice...

28^2

base 20

2x(28 + 8 ) | 8x8

= 72 | 64

= 784


106^2

106 + 6 | 6x6

base 100

=112 | 36

=11236 . since 100 has 2 zeroes, there shud be 2 digits on right side of the line....


103^2

base 100

103 + 3 | 3x3

=106 | 9

= 10609. ensure the no. of digits are exactly same as the no. of zeroes in base....so expressed 9 as 09....a 2 digit no.

312^2

base 300

3x(312 + 12) | 12^2

3x324 | 144

972 | 144

= 97344....1 of 144 carried.



smart ways of using this method....



98^2. now if v take base 100, v can avoid multiplication by 9.

so base 100.

98 - 2 | -2^2

= 96 | 04

= 9604....funny ha?



197^2

base 200

2x(197 - 3) | -3^2

=388 | 09

= 38809.


#2 : finding product of nos when they lie nearby.


all digits before 0 in base x (first no. + deviation of second no.) | deviation of first no. x deviation of second no.

rest, everything is same...

examples...

27 x 22 =

base 20

2x(27 + 2) | 7x2

= 58 | 14

= 594


103 x 108

base 100

= 103 + 8 | 3x8

= 111 | 24

=11124


97 x 102

base 200

97 + 2 | -3 x 2

=99 | -6

= 9900 - 6

= 9894



197 x 199

base 200

= 2x(197 - 1) | -3 x -1

= 392 | 03

= 39203


37 x 31

base 30

37 + 1) x 3 | 7x1

= 114 | 7

= 1147.


32 x 24

base 30

32 - 8 | 2 x -8

= 24 | -16

= 240 - 16

= 226.

to solve tricky questions based on no. of factors of a number.

Today's concept...to solve tricky questions based on no. of factors of a number.

Despite the interest shown in the concept yesterday, not many cud solve the question efficiently...so, best concept for the day can be to discuss yesterday's problems...have a quick, practical solution to them...and practice a lot of similar, different questions on same concept. here we go...


Find the smallest no. that has exactly.....

1. 16 factors

2. 12 factors

3. 60 factors


questions are lil tricky...but if u get the concept...they become child's play...see how...

16 factors...that mean product of (powers +1) of all the prime nos = 16.

now 16 can be achieved in following ways...

16
8x2
4x4
2x4x2
2x2x2x2.

by sheer common sense, v can say the highest power shud go to the smallest prime no. i.e. 2....and as v proceed, smaller powers shud be given to higher prime nos.

Concept:

powers shud reduce and the corresponding prime nos. shud increase.

so...

16...the no. is 2^15

8x2...the no. is 2^7 x 3

4x4...the no. is 2^3 x 3^3.

2x4x2...the no. is 2^3 x 3 x 5

2x2x2x2.....the no. is 2x3x5x7.

first three nos can be easily discarded as they are too big...just calculate last two nos, they are 120 and 210...120 is smaller and hence the answer.

important: please avoid craming...in few cases last way might give best answer..in other cases, 2nd last one...its always advicable to form patterns n check the closer ones.


2. 12 factors

12 = 12 or 4x3 or 2x2x3. easily answer wud be 2^3 x 3^2 or 2^2 x 3 x 5

the corresponding values are 72 n 60. hence, the answer is 60.

similarly, Q3 also.


4. how many factors of 27000 are perfect cubes?

i realy wonder y nobody cud get this right...u just need to form combinations and check which combinations give u cubes...they are 27000,27,1000, etc. am not discussing this question...i hope when i give a similar question today...i get few correct answers.

This question is still open for answers/discussion (so are others...but if u can answer this...with an xplanation, it'll be gr8 )


how many A.Ps are possible such that first term is 1235 and the last term is 3535 and there are atleast...

5. 3 terms

6. 4 terms

7. 5 terms

8. 6 terms



concept:

to have first n last term as the given terms...the difference b/w the two terms shud be divisible by the common difference. so u basically have to find how many such common differences exist...for every common difference...u'll get a new AP.

for practice, lets take a small interval [1,15]

the difference is 15-1=14. now 14 is divisible by 1,2,7,14...four different integers... so v can have four different APs...if v take a common difference other than these four values...the last term wont lie in that AP.

e.g if v take the common diff = 4, the AP wud be 1,5,9,13,17...see 15 didnt lie...

so, 4 APs are possible.

now if a conditions is attached...there shud be atleast three terms...it means that AP with 2 terms shud be neglected...
1,15 is an AP with jus 2 terms...so it shud be beglected...remember, an AP with 2 terms always lies in any interval.

so the answer wud be 4-1 = 3

if the condition is atleast four terms...then the AP with 2 terms as well as the AP with 3 terms shud be neglected.

we know that an AP with 2 terms is bound to exist...lets c if an AP with 3 terms also exists.

an AP with 3 terms will look like... 1, x, 15

see...there are 2 intervals... x-1 and 15-x. hence for a 3 term AP to exist, the difference shud be divisible by 2.

since 14 is divisible by 2, we further reduce the answer by 1...so APs with atleast 4 terms are 3-1 =2

now, if the conditions is...atleast 5 terms...v need to check if AP with 4 terms exists...
such an AP wud luk like...

1, x, y, 15

see, there are 3 intervals...since 14 is not divisible by 3, such an AP does not exist. so the answer remains 2.

similarly, for atleast 6 terms, v check if 14%4 = 0...since no, the answer is again 2

for 7 terms 14%5 is not 0, the answer is 2

for atleast 8 terms...14%6 is not 0 so the answer is again 2.

for 9 terms, 14%7 = 0. hence answer becomes 2-1 =1

keep on proceeding like this...the soln wont be so bulky...its been done like this for ease of understanding...for ease of calculation...see how to proceed...


how many A.Ps are possible such that first term is 1235 and the last term is 3535 and there are atleast...

5. 3 terms

6. 4 terms

7. 5 terms

8. 6 terms


3535 - 1235 = 2300.

2300 = 23x2^2x5^2 . hence, no. of factors = 3x3x2 = 18. (check yesterday's concept if missed)

how many APs...18.

how many with atleast 3 terms?
since 2300%1 = 0, 18-1 = 17

how many with atleast 4 terms?
2300%2 = 0, hence 17-1 = 16

how many with atleast 5 terms?
2300%3 =/ 0, answer remains 16. where =/ means not equal to

how many with atleast 6 terms?
2300%4 = 0, 16-1 = 15

how many with atleast 7 terms?
2300%5 = 0, 15-1 = 14

how many with atleast 8 terms?
2300%6 =/ 0 , answer remains 14

how many with atleast 9 terms?
2300%7 =/ 0, answer remains 14

and so on...

to check for atleast n terms, v need divisibility till n-2...i'll appreciate if u dont cram...but understand it...i've neva learnt it...its jus an observation...

so, the answers to above 3 questions wud be 17,16,16,15.



finally...

How many values of a are possible if x^2 + ax + 2400 has...

9. integral roots

10. roots which are natural nos.


this is an actually tricky problem...sad that nobody came up with this...see...


concept:

to solve ax2 + bx + c =0,

we break it as ax2 + mx + nx + c = 0, such that m*n = a*c.

here, a*c = 1*2400 = 2400. so v need to find in how many ways can 2400 be expressed as product of 2 nos. every such pair of nos. will give a new value of the coefficient of x.

2400 = 2^5 x 5^2 x 3

no. of factors = 6x3x2 = 36.

but these factors have to exist in pairs...e.g when v use one factor 2 (to express 2400 as 2x1200) the other factor...1200 is automatically used...so total pairs possible are ...

36/2 = 18.

but relax...this is not it....again...equal no. of negative pairs exist...i.e. 2x1200 corresponds to -2 x -1200. although the product is same as the reqd product i.e 2400...the sum is different...its 1202 n -1202...n v need to find different values of sum...hence the answer wud

18x2 = 36 again...

9. integral roots

10. roots which are natural nos.

9. for integral roots...the answer wud be 36
10. values wud be 1/2 the total possible values as negative roots aint allowed...36/2 = 18 is the answer


Kudos to rockeezee...who got 5 correct answers...so too to junoonmba,vani for their active participation!!! wud love to see all of u gett'n of the following correct today...

Today's questions...

smallest no. that has exactly.

1. 20 factors

2. 36 gactors

3. 30 factors

how many APs are possible such that the first term is 2454 , last term is 4254 and there are atleast...

4. 5 terms

5. 7 terms

6. 10 terms.


how many of the factors of 640000 have

7. perfect square roots.

8. perfect fourth roots

9. perfect cube roots

how many different values can 'A' take if x2 + Ax + 2500 has ...

10. integral roots

11. negative roots.

12. non-negative integral roots.

13. find the no. of factors 15! has (here comes the season of fresh concepts...which'll derive from older ones...he he)

14. find the no. of factors 18! has

Minimum value that A can take if x2 + Ax + 900 has...

15. Integral roots.

16. Negative integral roots.

17. Positive integral roots.

finding factors of a no. n sorting relevant questions.

Today's concept...finding factors of a no. n sorting relevant questions.


concepts...

#1. to find total no. of factors of a number.

=>first of all...express it in terms of prime numbers

e.g 1260^4.

express it as (2x2x3x3x5x7)^4 = 2^8 * 3^8 * 5^4*7^4.

=>now add 1 to the powers of every prime no. n multiply them all...u get the total no. of factors of 1260^4.

i.e (8+1)*(8+1)*(4+1)*(4+1) = 2025 = total no. of factors of 1260^4.




#2 to find no. of odd factors of a number.

leave power of 2 and multiply powers of all other prime nos after adding one to them.

i.e. (8 + 1)*(4+1)*(4+1) = 225 = no. of odd factors of 1260^4



#3 to find no. of even factors of a number.

take the difference of total factors and odd factors.

i.e. 2025 - 225 = 1800. = no. of even factors of 1260^4



#4 to find in how many ways can a given no. be represented as product of two relatively prime factors.

in this case, the power of prime no. becomes irrelevant as all the powers shud lie with the same factor else the two factors wont be relatively prime.

i.e in the above case 1260 = (2x2x3x3x5x7)^4 = 2^8 * 3^8 * 5^4*7^4.

now powers 8,8,4,4 have no importance...whats important is how many prime nos. are there...they are four...viz 2,3,5,7. hence 4.

now v have to form nos. using these 4 primr nos. its a like a question askin u...if u have 4 sweets...in how many ways can u eat them? the answer is 4C0..when u eat none... + 4C1 when eat any one...+4C2 + ...4C4...when u eat all.

similarly here, answer wud be 4C0 + 4C1 + 4C2 ...4C4 = 2^4 = 16.

but the factors have to exist in pairs...hence 2^4/2 = 8 factors are possible.

on a general note...a no. formed of n prime nos has 2^(n-1) pair of co-prime factors


Answers to yesterday's questions


1. 32^23 + 17^23 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


2. 32^23 - 17^23 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


3. 32^232 + 17^232 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


4. 32^232 - 17^232 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.



5. 32^2321 + 17^2321 + 13^2321 + 18^2321 is definetly divisible by....

a. 40 b. 20 c. 80 d. all of these. e. none of these.



what is the remainder when 42527152653425416242624272427215287 is divided by :

6. 16----7

7. 32----23

8. 64----55

kudos to irevani, gk who got all correct...so too to deep, rockeezee...who got jus 1 wrong....bhaiyon...if a no. is divisible by 80...its obviously divisible by 40 n 20.




questions for today...

on the very simple fundas above, very tricky questions can be framed.



Find the smallest no. that has exactly.....

1. 16 factors

2. 12 factors

3. 60 factors

4. how many factors of 27000 are perfect cubes?

how many A.Ps are possible such that first term is 1235 and the last term is 3535 and there are atleast...

5. 3 terms

6. 4 terms

7. 5 terms

8. 6 terms

How many values of a are possible if x^2 + ax + 2400 has...

9. integral roots

10. roots which are natural nos.

few tricky questions on divisibility

Today's concept...few tricky questions on divisibility


concepts...


a^n - b^n is always divisible by a-b

a^n - b^n is divisible by a+b when n is even.

a^n + b ^n is divisible by a+b when n is odd.

a^n + b^n + c^n +... is divisible by a+b+c+.... when n is odd.

when last n digits of a no. are divided by 2^n, the remainder is same as the remainder when the entire no. is divided by 2^n.





Answers to yesterday's questions.

1. smallest no. that must be added to 1000 so that the resultant no. leaves remainders 2,3,4,5 with 5,6,7,11 respectivelt----667

2. smallest no. that leaves remainders 1,2,5,6, when divided successively by 2,3,4,23.----such a no. doesnt exist as 5 rem with aint possible.

3. smallest no. that leaves remainders 4 everytime when successively divided by 7,5,10,13 respectively.----872

4. a no. leaves remainders 2,5,3,7 when successively divided by 3,7,6,9. what is the remainder when this no. is divided by 126?----80

5.find the largest no. that leaves same remainder when it divides 2345,7645,9845,6595 and 10095.----50

6.a no. when divided 88 leaves remainder 3. what is the remainder when its divided by 11? ----3

7.a no. when divided by 391 leaves rem. of 49. find the remainder when its divided by 39...options 29,10,none of these,cannot be determined.---cannot be detrmnd

kudos to rockeezee who got most of them right!



questions for today...

1. 32^23 + 17^23 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


2. 32^23 - 17^23 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


3. 32^232 + 17^232 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


4. 32^232 - 17^232 is definetly divisible by....

a. 49 b. 15 c. 49 & 15 d. none of these.


5. 32^2321 + 17^2321 + 13^2321 + 18^2321 is definetly divisible by....

a. 40 b. 20 c. 80 d. all of these. e. none of these.


what is the remainder when 42527152653425416242624272427215287 is divided by :

6. 16

7. 32

8. 64

concept regarding numbers giving specific remainders with specific divisors.

Today's concept...an extension of concept regarding numbers giving specific remainders with specific divisors.

Type#5

Smallest no. that must be subtracted from 1000 so that the resultant no. leaves remainders 1,3,4,8 with divisors 2,6,5,13 respectively.

from yesterday's approach, v can find out...the smallest no. satisfying all 4 conditions is 99. now to 99 if v add lcm of 2,6,5,13 i.e. 390, the remainders will remain unchanged.

so v need 99 + 390k such that the resultant value is just below 1000.
easily, for k=2, we get one such value....99+390x2 = 879.

hence, ans is 1000-879=121

Type#6

smallest no. that leaves remainders 3,2,4 when successively divided by 5,6,7 respectively.

for such questions...start approaching from the rear end...

we want 4 remainder with 7...the smallest such no. is 4 itself.

now this 4 must have come after a no. was divided by 6
so the no. must have been 4x6+2(remainder with 6) = 26

now, 26 was the quotient when sum no. was divided by 5
so the no. must have been 26x5 + 3(remainder with 5) = 133

so, the answer is 133.

Type#7

a no. leaves remainder 3 when divided by 5 and remainder 8 when successively divided by 11. what is the remainder when this no. is divided by 55?

look at this question carefully...55 is lcm of earlier divisors 11,5... in such a case...the remainder with lcm as divisor wud be constant.

an easy approach for this problem...start from the rear end...take a small no. that leaves rem. 8 with 11...lets take 8.

this 8 is quotient when the main no. is divided by 5...it also leaves remainder 3.

hence, the main no. is

8x5 + 3 = 43

43%55 = 43 answer.

Type#8

Find the largest no. that leaves same remainder when it divides 3398 and 6578.

the concept is very simple...to leave same remainder...difference between two dividents must be divisible by the divisor.

i.e. 6578-3398 = 3180 shud be divisible by the divisor to leave same remainders.

largest no. that divides 3180 is 3180 itself.

hence, the answer is 3180.

Type#9

Find the largest no. that leaves same remainder when it divides 16009,9009,7509 and 14009.

the approach is same... take difference of the nos in ascending or descending order....
i.e. 16009-14009=2000,
14009-9009=5000
9009-7509=1500.

now to leave same remainder, each of the interval shud be divisible by the divisor.

hence, take hcf of 2000,5000,1500. i.e. 500

so, the answer is 500.


Type#10

If a no. is divided by 15, it leaves a remainder 7, if thrice the no. is divided by 5, then what is the remainder?
options...1,2,3,4,0

such questions are difficult to frame as one has to find a pattern b/w divisors n remainders...i know these questions are easy n v all can crack it easily...but the reason y am putting it here is bcoz i have a very short...practical approach for solving this question..

choose a no. that leaves 7 remainder with 15....lets take 7 only.

thrice 7 = 21

21%5 =1 (edited after vani's post)


since, the no. shud give same result for all values that give 7 rem. with 15, its better to take sum value n solve it instead of takin an algebraic approach...

hence, answer is 1.

Answers for yesterday's questions...

Q1. 2 when divided by 3,5,6 or 9 (other than 2)----92
Q2. 2,5,7 when divided by 7,10 and 12 respectively----415
Q3. 1,2,3,4 with 3,4,5,7 respectively.----298
Q4. 6 with 7,8,9,10 and 3 with 11.----20166
Q5. 3 with 6, 0 with 11, 3 with 5, 7 with 8----1023
Q6. 2 with 5, 7 with 8, 3 with 4, 5 with 7&11----2007
Q7. 1 with 11, 4 with 5, 9 with 10, 7 with 9.----529

kudos to vani for the active participation n gett'n most answers correct.



Today's questions...

1. smallest no. that must be added to 1000 so that the resultant no. leaves remainders 2,3,4,5 with 5,6,7,11 respectivelt

2. smallest no. that leaves remainders 1,2,5,6, when divided successively by 2,3,4,23.

3. smallest no. that leaves remainders 4 everytime when successively divided by 7,5,10,13 respectively.

4. a no. leaves remainders 2,5,3,7 when successively divided by 3,7,6,9. what is the remainder when this no. is divided by 126?

5.find the largest no. that leaves same remainder when it divides 2345,7645,9845,6595 and 10095.

6.a no. when divided 88 leaves remainder 3. what is the remainder when its divided by 11?

7.a no. when divided by 391 leaves rem. of 49. find the remainder when its divided by 39...options 29,10,none of these,cannot be determined.

Some speed maths stuff

The approach would be to get the denominator to either a 100 or a 1000 because that is what percentages is all bout.
Simply focus on the fact that how do the given denominators reach 100/1000. I have left some blank because they are very obvious.

The following are the stations between 100 and 1000

100
111 - Reduce 10%
125 - Multiply by 8
133 - Reduce 1/4
150 - Reduce 1/3
166 - Multiply by 6
182 - Add 10%
200
222 - Reduce 10%
250
273 - Add 10%
300
333 - Reduce 10%
364
400
455 - Add 10%
500
555 - Reduce 10%
600
666 - Add Half
700
750 - Add 1/3
800
833 - Add 20%
875 - Add 1/7
900
910 - Add 9%
950 - Add 5%
1000

So Task (1) you have to mug up the values of these stations. It is very important that these values are memorized because this will help you in
knowing which number to reach from any given number. e.g. if the denominator is 887 you know you have to reach for 900 or 875 and so on.

Task (2) Practice!

Below is an approach to tackle (three digit /three digit) with consummate ease. We shall attempt to understand it with examples.

Example 1:
What is 145/182 ------------------79.5

Steps
1. add 10% to numerator and denominator...
2. it becomes 159/200 ...............which is 79.5
( the answer from the calculator is 79.6)

Example 2:
123/178....???

Step1:- which station is closest to it?.............................200?...or some say 150. Either is good. (identification took 2 seconds)

Step 2:- what do I have to do to go from 178 to 200/150..................add 22/subtract 28... (another 2 seconds.)

Step 3:- so if I add 22................i am actually adding slightly less than 13% of 178 to itself.

This part is tricky.. here is how I got it:

This is how u need to think---
Our number is 178. Thus, 10% of it is 17.8
22 definitely more than 10% .
if 10% = 17.8 then 5% = 8.xx

And 2.5% = 4.xxx (don't even bother to calculate xxx)
which means its around 12.5........or 13 or 12..........

Add same to numerator...........10% of 123 = 12.3
1% = 1.23 so 2% = 2.46

So 12% = 15?
So it becomes 138/200 = 69%?
(calculator answer is 69.1).

All you require to calculate is what is 10% 1%...and approx stuff...any damn calculation works in less than 8 seconds.:satisfie:

Some thing like (2456*4567 - 2134*3214)/2134*3214 will taken 10 seconds maximum...
it works coz I had that time 1.5 years ago..and I aint kidding..


Lets take one more.
Example 3: 532/745?
Tough???

This's how it can be approached:
# Nearest station.........750.................so add 5..............about 1% or less..add 1% damnit
# Numerator now is 537.............(added 1%)
# Fraction is 537/750 add 1/3 each...........it is 71 something.

Remember here don't even attempt to do...537/3. Because denominator is a 1000 and not a 100. So one digit is redundant. So all I do is........53/3 approx..18...plus..53 = 71%..(will do if answer are spaced...)

answers not spaced? Then 537 +537/3 = 537+179 = 716 which makes it 71.6 (calculator is 71.5)

Dont worry if the last few statements were difficult to digest. Try solving a few questions and you'll get the crux of it.

Remember in CAT we don't find answers... we choose them!
Happy Computing